Are Loli and Lolicon Against the Law in the US?
2003’s Protect Act ensured that the possession of child pornography is illegal in the US. The act clarifies that all illicit images depicting minors are child pornography. The act also makes online or virtual child pornography illegal, even if the video or images do not depict a real child.
Based on the fact that lolicon includes images of a minor involved in sexually obscene situations, loli breaches US laws and is illegal. If an individual has loli on their computer or in a different fashion, the authorities can arrest the person and charge them with a crime.
It is not only the US that has restricted loli materials. Other countries have also criminalized loli and lolicon. Other countries classify loli as:
- Child pornography
- Illegal material
- Pedophilia
However, in some countries, such as Germany, Loli is legal. Germany justifies this by asserting that since Loli is a cartoon and does not depict real individuals, it need not be illegal. However, other countries such as Britain deem loli illegal because viewing any sexualized images of minors is unlawful.
What is California’s Position on Loli?
According to California’s Penal Code, child pornography is defined as:
- Any material that shows minors involved in sexual contact or simulating illicit contact
However, California’s laws regarding child pornography do not directly mention loli, lolicon, shotocon, or any other materials related to Loli or Japanese anime.
In past cases, the state’s Court of Appeals ruled that a “real child” has to be involved in creating child pornography.
If we apply this ruling, and the specification that a “real” child must be the one engaged in or simulating sex, then loli does not appear illegal in California.
Importantly, loli is unlawful under federal law, which supersedes state law. So ultimately, if a person watches loli or has loli on their computer or in some other form, they could be arrested on federal charges.
What is Considered Child Pornography in California?
In California, the state must certify two essential facts to convict someone on a charge of child pornography.
- One, the state must show that the individual was aware that they possessed the illicit material.
- Two, the state of California must show that the person was aware, or should have been aware, that the persons represented in the material were under 18.
If the police caught the person with the material on their person or their computer, then the first fact is relatively easy to prove. However, it can be challenging to convincingly show that a person knew or should have been aware that the people pictured in the material were minors as opposed to adults.
How Can Individuals Defend Themselves Against Untrue or Unwarranted Child Pornography Charges?
Child pornography is a serious federal offense, and if the state of California proves its case against the plaintiff, the penalties are strict and can impact the rest of their lives.
When an individual must fight wrongful child pornography charges, they should contact an experienced criminal defense attorney.
Though a child pornography case can instantly damage a person’s reputation and personal life, some valid potential defense strategies exist. These include:
- Claiming that the individual thought the people involved were over 18 years of age
- Claiming that the illicit material was unrequested and came from someone else via a mistake, spam email, or a similar source
- Claiming that the person accessed the website or online material by accident and tried to prevent any future access to the illegal material
When an individual becomes involved in a child pornography case, they need strong representation. Their attorney will analyze the case’s facts and devise a strategy. Their attorney will also expect the plaintiff to be honest about their experiences and any mistakes they made. Therefore, the plaintiff must disclose all evidence to their legal team before the criminal charge goes to court.