What is Lolli?
Lollicon or Lolli is a Japanese style of animation that focuses on underage female cartoon characters involved in sexual situations. Shotacon is similar to Lolli, but it features boys instead of girls.
Lolli does not feature any images or videos of human children, and no children are involved in Lolli’s production. Instead, Lolli is meant for adults.
This type of cartoon is very provocative. As a result, many countries have approved laws that make Shotacan and Lolli unlawful. For example, Lolli is illegal in the United Kingdom.
However, both Shotacon and Lolli are legal in Germany. The country has decided that since the cartoons do not represent or depict actual children, they do not violate the law.
Is Lolli Against the Law in California?
The US government and the country’s laws are meant to protect children from harm. For example, in the US, we have severe laws banning the sexual assault of children, molestation, and the viewing and sharing of child pornography. Based on this, when an individual is convicted of a sex crime involving children, they may face prison before being registered as a sex offender.
However, the plot thickens when we consider how sexually suggestive and sexually explicit cartoons fit into the equation. Many individuals do not know that they can be charged and found guilty of child pornography for viewing certain cartoons.
2003’s PROTECT Act defined obscene images as anything that features a minor. Importantly, the act does not limit the materials to photos but includes illustrations, drawings, and other renderings in pictures and videos.
If an individual possesses a video or image that depicts a child in an illicit situation, they can end up in a lot of trouble. In this article, we will describe how Lolli has become so controversial and also detail the penalties for possessing or viewing Lolli in any shape or form.
Is Lolli Allowed in California?
PC311, the state’s child pornography law, does not specifically note whether obscene illustrations of children are considered child pornography.
However, in the instructive case People vs. Gerber, the court decided that child pornography depends on the fact that a real child engages in sexual behavior.
Therefore, based on the People vs. Gerber decision, Lolli is not unlawful in California.
However, Lolli is federally illegal, so it is against the law to own, view, or traffic Shotacon or Lolli in the state of California.
What Are the Defenses Used Against Federal Child Pornography Charges?
A child pornography offense is a grave, so a child pornography charge is very severe. When the court convicts an individual of being involved with child pornography, the person faces the following:
- Jail or prison time
- Severe fines
- Becoming registered as a sex offender for the rest of their lives
A child pornography conviction can shatter someone’s goals, personal life, and career ambitions, not to mention wreak havoc on their mental and physical health. Sex offenders struggle to find employment, enroll in higher education, and live in certain places
where the community will not agree to their presence. These penalties and repercussions speak to the gravity of the crime.
However, sometimes people are wrongfully accused, or the issue is not entirely black and white. For example, imagine that one individual emails another some Lolli images, but the recipient does not look at the images. However, the email with the images remains in their inbox. Are they guilty of possessing Lolli, even unknowingly?
When someone is accused of a child pornography offense, they must speak with an experienced sex crimes lawyer as soon as possible. Often prosecutors are vigilant, forceful, and even hostile in these cases, so one’s attorney must be strong, determined, and knowledgeable.
How Can an Attorney Defeat Child Pornography Charges?
Skilled lawyers have specific strategies for dealing with child pornography charges suited to a specific case. These may include:
- Illegal search and seizure: If the prosecutor did not gather the evidence against the defendant lawfully, it could not be used in court
- Lack of intent: If the person mistakenly clicked on a link, for example, and therefore did not intend to do so, they cannot be treated the same as a person who willingly searched for or held child pornography
- False accusation: Sometimes, individuals accuse people of child pornography of damaging their reputation severely and permanently. False accusations are common in child sex cases, but a skilled attorney can resolve the issue.
At Nakase Wade, our skilled legal team is here for you. Contact us for a free consultation today if you feel you have been wrongfully accused.
https://california-business-lawyer-corporate-lawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/loli-anime-girl.jpg
962
1747
Amit
http://california-business-lawyer-corporate-lawyer.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Nakase-Wade-logo-transparent-200x54px.png
Amit2023-02-12 15:38:152023-04-17 16:34:26Is lolli Illegal?
