Is Employees Paid in Cash Legal?
It is not illegal for employees to be paid in cash if there is a pay stub and tax deductions.
It is not illegal for employees to be paid in cash if there is a pay stub and tax deductions.
By Brad Nakase, Attorney
Email | Call (800) 484-4610
Get Smarter. Search FAQs.
While it is legal for employees to be paid in cash, an employer should maintain accurate records of tax deductions for smooth operations. Using a paystub or payslip generator can function as evidence of income. Importantly, cash payments should not exceed $10,000. Although you may have informed your accountant about the payment, they do not withhold any state or federal taxes from your employee’s salary or wages. This may result in a substantial tax liability at year-end, but it can be a strategic approach to prevent excessive tax payments over the year.
Regardless, employees paid in cash involves specific legal considerations, and it is vital that an employer is well-versed in the employment laws. While the practice may appear straightforward, incorrect execution can lead to significant repercussions when employees are paid in cash. Seeking guidance from an employer lawyer in California or accountant is highly recommended when employees are paid in cash.
In the first stages of starting a business, paying in cash may be the most practical approach for expense management. Employees paid in cash is especially advantageous for companies employing contractors rather than full-time staff, at least at the beginning, as it allows the business to circumvent Medicare and Social Security taxes, which can become substantial expenses.
If you decide to compensate a worker in cash and do not deduct federal taxes, it becomes your duty as a business owner, manager, or supervisor to submit IRS Form W-11 to your accountant. This action ensures that the employees paid in cash is appropriately reported to the IRS.
While it is technically legal, transitioning from direct deposits and checks to cash payments for employees can pose significant challenges for employers. Daily tax withholding can be onerous, even though most payroll systems offer this capability. Opting for monthly or weekly tax withholding through a payroll service tends to be more streamlined.
Further, it can be hard to demonstrate that cash payments were not misappropriated by a worker who issued unauthorized checks against business funds. In the event of employee injury or workers’ compensation claims, it can be difficult for the workers to demonstrate that they were paid in cash. This could potentially result in the employer being responsible for their medical expenses, even if negligence on the part of the employee contributed to the incident.
In sum, while legal, employees paid in cash warrants careful consideration of its advantages and disadvantages. If feasible, an employer should seek advice from an employment attorney regarding cash payments.
The term “getting paid under the table” refers to a situation where an employee is paid in cash for goods or services in cash or other forms of compensation without the transaction being officially recorded or reported to the government for taxation or regulatory purposes. It is also commonly known as “off-the-books” payment or “cash-in-hand.”
When an employee is paid in cash, neither the employer nor the employee reports the income to tax authorities or other relevant agencies. As a result, the income is not subject to income tax, social security contributions, or any other deductions that would typically be applied to a formal employment arrangement.
While some people might see this as a way to avoid taxes and possibly receive more money upfront, it is important to recognize that getting paid under the table is usually illegal and considered tax evasion. Both the employer and the employee may face severe consequences if caught, including fines, penalties, and potential criminal charges.
For employers, paying workers under the table can also lead to other legal issues, such as violating labor laws, workers’ rights, and insurance requirements.
In sum, employees paid in cash is an informal and non-compliant method of compensation that bypasses the usual tax and regulatory obligations. It is strongly advised to avoid engaging in such practices and to ensure that all income is properly reported and taxes are paid in accordance with the law.
In California, it is generally legal for employees to be paid in cash, as long as certain requirements are met and the employer complies with the relevant labor laws. However, even if an employee is paid in cash, the employer is still obligated to provide an itemized pay statement that includes specific information, as outlined in California Labor Code Section 226(a).
California Labor Code Section 226(a) mandates that employers must provide accurate and itemized written statements to employees at the time they are paid in cash. The pay statement, commonly known as a wage statement or pay stub, should contain the following information:
The purpose of this requirement is to provide transparency and ensure that employees have access to detailed information about their wages and deductions, which helps to prevent potential wage disputes and protect employees’ rights.
If an employer fails to provide accurate itemized pay statements as required by Section 226(a), they may be subject to penalties under California labor laws. The penalties can vary depending on the circumstances, and employees may have the right to file a claim or take legal action to enforce their rights.
While it is legal for employees to be paid in cash in California, employers must still comply with the state’s labor laws, including providing accurate and itemized pay statements to their employees. It is advisable for employers to maintain detailed and organized payroll records to ensure compliance with the law and to protect both their interests and those of their employees.
If a California employer paid an employee in cash and fails to provide proper itemized pay statements as required by Labor Code Section 226(a), the employee may be entitled to damages and other remedies under the law. This situation may arise when an employer engages in off-the-books payment practices and intentionally avoids providing official records of wages and deductions.
Under Labor Code Section 226(a), employers are required to provide accurate itemized wage statements to employees. If they fail to do so, an employee who is paid under the table may have grounds to seek damages, which can include:
It is important to note that the specific remedies and damages available to an employee will depend on the circumstances of each case, and the court will consider factors such as the severity of the violations, the employer’s willfulness, and the impact on the employee. Seeking an employer lawyer can help companies understand how to pay in cash legally.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment
Most recent blogs: