Is constructive discharge legal in California?
Many California employees ask what conditions lead to constructive discharge and what must occur for constructive dismissal to occur.
When employers in California force their workers to quit and use the following behaviors, the employers commit constructive discharge:
- Mistreatment
- Retaliation
- Discrimination
- Intimidation
Employers who refuse to fire employees outright may try other tactics, such as cutting employees’ hours or lowering their pay. For example, if an employee goes from 40 to 10 hours per week and cannot pay his or her bills, they may feel they have to leave their job.
Many workers feel trapped when confronted with this type of behavior by an employer. They worry that quitting will mean they give up their legal rights. Employees whose employers are mistreating or intimidating them also wonder when they can take action against their employer. For example, does an employee have to be legally separated from the business to take legal action against it?
Since California is an at-will working state, businesses can fire workers for any given reason and do not need to provide advance notice or explanation.
The other side of this at-will policy in California is that employees can quit their jobs whenever they want, and they do not need to provide notice or justification to their employers.
However, there exist exceptions to these rules. For example, the employer’s at-will status may have been violated if an employee can prove that they were terminated based on discrimination.
If an employer fires an at-will worker because of a protected characteristic, they can file a discrimination claim. These characteristics include:
- Age
- Race
- Disability
- Gender
- Origin
- Sex
- Religion
Workers who possess employment contracts or who work for a specific amount of time also present as exceptions to the rule.
The main difference between an at-will employee who is terminated and an employee who is constructively dismissed is: employees who are constructively terminated give up specific rights that those fired as at-will workers hold onto.
When workers are constructively dismissed, they may find themselves ineligible to:
- File for employment benefits
- File a wrongful termination claim
Understanding the differences between employers who terminate at-will employees and those who constructively dismiss their workers helps California workers understand their rights.
Is constructive discharge the same as wrongful termination?
The similarity between constructive discharge and wrongful termination is that the employment relationship ends. The difference between constructive discharge and wrongful termination depends on who terminates the employment relationship. When an employer wrongfully ends the employment relationship, it is a wrongful termination. A constructive termination occurs when the workplace condition causes an employee to terminate an employment relationship.
When illegal termination occurs, informed employees may be able to collect damages because their employer fired them for unlawful reasons.
What are unlawful reasons for termination? In California, under the state’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), it is illegal to terminate an employee because of their:
- Sexual orientation
- Gender
- Origin
- Color
- Age
- Physical disability
- Mental disability
- Participation in an Official Investigation Against the Employer
- Pregnancy
- Religion
- Other guidelines designated by state and federal law
Therefore, in California, employees who fall under these protected characteristics have a path for legal action. However, the workers usually need to have been terminated. If an employee quits and then tries to sue for wrongful termination, their claim will probably not achieve anything.
Constructive dismissal occurs when an employer creates a hostile work environment that leads the employee to quit. When the employer constructively terminates an employee, the employee can take advantage of a legal exception. However, since the employee is “forced” to quit, they may be able to sue the employer for their actions.
When an employer creates the conditions for constructive termination, they are effectively “firing” the employee, albeit indirectly.
Why is constructive discharge important?
Constructive discharge is a legal doctrine in California that protects employees from facing unjust consequences when they feel compelled to resign due to unbearable and unlawful working conditions. This doctrine recognizes that quitting should not automatically result in employees losing their remedies and legal rights, especially when employers intentionally create an environment designed to force an employee to quit.
- Protecting Employee Rights: Constructive discharge safeguards employees’ rights and ensures that they are not left without legal recourse when they face unlawful and discriminatory actions at the workplace. It recognizes that employees should not be forced to endure intolerable conditions and have the right to seek remedies if they are pushed to resign due to an employer’s misconduct.
- Combating Unlawful Practices: By recognizing constructive discharge, the law discourages employers from engaging in discriminatory and retaliatory actions that could lead to employees feeling compelled to quit. Employers are more likely to think twice before creating hostile work environments or engaging in unlawful practices if they know that their actions may still be subject to legal consequences, even if the employee resigns.
- Equal Treatment for Resigned Employees: Treating constructive discharge as equivalent to an involuntary termination ensures that employees who resign due to intolerable working conditions are not unfairly disadvantaged compared to those who are terminated outright. This legal principle promotes fairness and equal protection under the law for all employees.
- Encouraging Reporting of Wrongful Actions: Recognizing constructive discharge encourages employees to come forward and report instances of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation without fear of losing their rights if they decide to resign. It supports a work environment where employees feel empowered to assert their rights and hold employers accountable for unlawful practices.
- Complex and Comprehensive Legal Protection: Constructive discharge cases can be intricate and challenging to navigate, requiring substantial evidence to prove the employer’s intent and the severity of the working conditions. By seeking the expertise of a constructive discharge lawyer in California, employees gain access to comprehensive legal protection and representation in their pursuit of justice and compensation.
- Deterring Unlawful Employer Behavior: The availability of constructive discharge as a legal remedy deters employers from trying to exploit the “at-will” employment status by creating hostile conditions to force employees out. This creates a safer and more equitable work environment, promoting respect for employee rights and dignity.
What are the elements of wrongful termination in California?
Proving that constructive discharge occurred can challenge both the employee and their attorney. Workers must prove three aspects of the case to succeed with their claim for wrongful termination.
California employees must prove that:
- Their employer sought to terminate the worker for discriminatory, unlawful, or retaliatory reasons
- The worker had no choice but to resign because the workplace conditions were hostile and made normal work impossible.
- The employer attempted to force the worker to quit by creating an intolerable and unbearable workplace.
California employees wondering if their work environments qualify as hostile should take note: it is not enough that their workplace is unfriendly or disagreeable. It is not enough if the worker does not enjoy working at the office or job site.
The workplace must be insufferable enough that any worker in the same position would leave. Additionally, the company must be aware—and shown to be aware—of the workplace conditions. For example, if the workplace was hostile, but the supervisor or CEO had no idea, it may become difficult to prove a constructive dismissal claim.
Also, the employer must have been aware that the employee found the working conditions hostile and unbearable and then did nothing about it.
While it is not vital for the worker to show that their employer acted in a retaliatory way, they need to show that the company was aware of intolerable conduct. For example, if discriminatory behavior occurred often, and the employer was aware of the taunting and racial slurs, but did nothing about it, the case for constructive dismissal could be successful.
What are examples of constructive discharge in California?
When employers force employees to leave their jobs, they should be able to recognize the clues that their dismissal was both constructive and possibly illegal.
In California, it can be difficult for employees to prove that they quit their job because they were forced out and had no other choice. However, here are some examples of employer behavior that typically qualifies as constructive termination.
- Repeatedly yelling at and badgering employees
- Intimidating workers repeatedly with insults and curses
- Any type of repeated harassment, be it physical or verbal
- Harassment that is overtly sexual
- A sudden and dramatic reduction in employee responsibilities
- A sudden change in work hours or location
- Unfair performance evaluations that aren’t factual
- Placing an employee at risk of physical injury through an assignment
- Transferring a worker to a distant branch or department for no reason
- Repeatedly making discriminatory comments against a worker
While all these actions are offensive, we cannot suggest that they will lead to a successful constructive discharge claim. On the contrary, these cases are highly subjective and based on individual circumstances.
However, if individuals keep careful records of their employer’s harmful actions and have trusted witnesses to present, their claim will have a better chance of success. For example, if a worker is repeatedly berated by their superior, they should gather witnesses and ask if they are willing to support them. Likewise, if an employer moves a worker’s desk for no reason, they can keep a record of this and even take pictures of the environmental change.
On the other hand, California courts also establish that some claims, if unaccompanied by other evidence or witnesses, will not be validated. The following evidential claims do not suffice for workers who deign to claim constructive dismissal:
- Demotion at work
- Lowering of pay
- A change in hours or benefits
- Promotions of employees
- One single episode of mistreatment, not a pattern
- Other acts that may not qualify
When individuals are unsure whether it makes sense to make a constructive claim, the best thing they can do is consult with an experienced wrongful termination attorney. At Nakase Wade, we offer free initial consultations and can help you figure out if the conditions are right to begin an employment law case.