How to fight and win an ADA lawsuit.
To fight an win an ADA lawsuit, attack the plaintiff’s standing by proving that the plaintiff does not live nearby, has no history of being a customer, and does not frequently travels nearby.
To fight an win an ADA lawsuit, attack the plaintiff’s standing by proving that the plaintiff does not live nearby, has no history of being a customer, and does not frequently travels nearby.
By Brad Nakase, Attorney
Email | Call (800) 484-4610
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
To successfully defend against and win an ADA lawsuit, it is crucial to challenge the plaintiff’s standing by demonstrating that they do not reside in the vicinity, they lack a record of being a patron, and they infrequently visit the area.
The ADA legislation has brought about numerous improvements in accessibility for individuals with disabilities. However, it has also given rise to instances of opportunistic lawsuit abuse. There has been a surge in what are known as “drive-by lawsuits,” wherein individuals survey a business from a vehicle to pinpoint any violations they can exploit for legal action. Subsequently, they utilize this information to initiate lawsuits based on minor ADA infractions.
In the event that you decide to settle the lawsuit, promptly file a motion to stay the case, allowing time for the rectification of ADA violations. This action will help mitigate attorney fees.
To mount a defense against a drive-by lawsuit, it is imperative for a business to engage a proficient attorney who can win an ADA lawsuit. They can conduct a thorough examination of your business operations to identify any areas where ADA compliance may be lacking. If no issues are found, you can adopt an assertive defense strategy. Conversely, if compliance shortcomings are discovered, your business can take steps to rectify them and thereby mitigate potential repercussions.
In drive-by lawsuit scenarios, an ADA defense attorney will endeavor to establish that the plaintiff is not a patron and does not have intentions to return to your premises, thus lacking standing in court. This can lead to the dismissal, effectively allowing a business owner to win an ADA lawsuit.
For a plaintiff to present a valid claim in federal court, they must establish constitutional standing, which necessitates the following:
Furthermore, the plaintiff must demonstrate a tangible and imminent risk of injury. It is not permissible for a plaintiff to initiate a lawsuit based on the potential of future harm or discrimination. To win an ADA lawsuit, a defendant must disprove the above elements.
Four-Part Test for Plaintiff’s Standing in ADA Claims
To ascertain whether a plaintiff possesses the standing to bring forth an ADA claim, the courts have devised a four-part test. A plaintiff must meet the following criteria:
For instance, previous cases have been dismissed when the plaintiff resides over 100 miles away, as it is improbable they will return to the property. Plaintiffs can counter this if they can establish business connections or family ties in the area, demonstrating frequent visits.
Cases have also been dismissed when the plaintiff has only visited the premises once, indicating a lack of substantial association with the establishment. Absent proof of the plaintiff’s likelihood to return, they lack standing to pursue an ADA claim. Thus, a defendant can win an ADA lawsuit.
These criteria serve as a potent defense against “drive-by lawsuits.” A business’s legal counsel can effectively demonstrate that the claim stems from the plaintiff merely “testing” for compliance, rather than facing a genuine and immediate threat of injury. A proficient attorney will conduct thorough research on the plaintiff to demonstrate their failure to meet any of the four criteria essential to establish standing. Successfully establishing this, the case is likely to be dismissed before it causes damage to the business’s reputation, and a business owner can win the ADA lawsuit.
The following are defenses that a business owner’s attorney may employ to win an ADA lawsuit:
In most situations, a disabled plaintiff faces no significant hurdles in proving the first two factors of standing for a claim under Title III. It is the third element, demonstrating a plausible desire or intent to return to the location where they previously ran into an ADA violation, or failing to show a probability of discrimination upon returning, that certain courts have used to prevent plaintiffs from looking for injunctive relief for past Title III ADA violations.
This is one of the defenses that an ADA defense lawyer would consider using when trying to win an ADA lawsuit.
Undue hardship in accommodation refers to significant expense or difficulty, taking into account the net cost and nature of the accommodation, the complete economic resources of the covered business, the impact on the facility’s operation, the ability of other workers to fulfill their duties, and the effect on the facility’s ability to operate. This factors in accommodations that are excessively substantial, extensive, or disruptive, or that would completely alter the operation or nature of the business.
This counts as another defense that an ADA defense attorney would consider using when trying to win an ADA lawsuit.
When evaluating whether a person would create a direct threat, factors to consider include the risk duration, the severity and nature of potential harm, the likelihood of potential harm occurring, and the imminence of potential harm.
This is another defense that an ADA defense attorney would consider using when trying to win an ADA lawsuit.
These ADA defenses encompass situations where the removal of alleged barriers would completely change the nature of the public accommodation belonging to the defendant; where removal of the alleged barriers is not readily achievable; and where the suggested modifications would create an unreasonable burden on the business owner.
An ADA defense attorney may consider using this defense when trying to win an ADA lawsuit for an employer.
These defenses cover scenarios where compliance would be impracticable on a structural level; where the claim of a plaintiff is time-barred by the statute of limitations; and where the renovations were not considered alterations.
This is one of the defenses that an ADA defense attorney would consider using when trying to win an ADA lawsuit for an employer.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment
Most recent blogs: