What Is Quid Pro Quo in Legal Terms?
Quid pro quo refers to an exchange where one party provides something in return for another’s benefit or service. It remains lawful unless associated with bribery, corruption, or unfair influence.
Quid pro quo refers to an exchange where one party provides something in return for another’s benefit or service. It remains lawful unless associated with bribery, corruption, or unfair influence.
By Douglas Wade, Attorney
Email | Call (800) 484-4610
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
The concept of “something for something,” or “quid pro quo” in Latin, emerged in Europe throughout the Middle Ages. It explains what happens when two people agree to trade products or services with each other. So, in a quid pro quo arrangement, one party’s transfer is dependent on another party’s transfer.
The phrase “quid pro quo” is used in legal and business contexts to indicate that something of equal worth has been traded for a good or service. Politicians have used it to talk about the illegal practice of “I’ll do something for you, if you do something for me.” However, it is okay as long as there is no corruption or dishonesty.
Key Points
Consideration, which can be anything from a service or item to money or other financial instruments, is essential to a quid pro quo commercial arrangement. These things are a part of a contract when one party gives something and the other party receives something of equal worth. In the absence of these factors, a court may declare a contract void or unenforceable.
The courts may also declare the contract void if it seems unfair or shows an excessive bias. It is important for every person, company, or other organization engaging in commercial transactions to understand the roles that each party plays when entering into a contract.
The term “quid pro quo” refers to a type of commercial agreement in which one party swaps one good or service for another of comparable value; one such instance is a bartering arrangement. In other situations, a quid pro quo could refer to a less equitable arrangement comprising a “favor for a favor” deal instead of a fair trade of services or products.
In some situations, the phrase “quid pro quo” might imply something bad. When a public firm and an investment bank’s research division get into a “quid pro quo” arrangement, the former may agree to adjust the bank’s share rating in return for underwriting business from the latter.
U.S. financial authorities have looked at these possible biases and published regulations to make sure that companies prioritize their customers’ interests when giving stock ratings, rather than their own.
A soft dollar deal is another type of dubious corporate quid pro quo. Companies A and B enter into a soft dollar agreement when they use each other’s research. Firm B then completes all deals for Firm A.
The payment is not in the form of real currency but rather an exchange of services. Soft dollar agreements result in higher transaction costs compared to execution-only arrangements, according to the research.
While some governments restrict soft dollar arrangements and some consider them as immoral, these types of deals are lawful in the US and other locations.
Donors in the United States are subject to limitations on the amount of money they may donate to a political campaign according to the Federal Election Campaign Act.
Even in politics, there may be quid pro quo deals. One such arrangement is for a politician to promise to take a donor’s wishes into account when making decisions or implementing policies in the future.
The politician may promise to take the donor’s preferences into account when formulating policies or casting votes on legislation; this kind of arrangement does not always constitute bribery.
Quid pro quo is a contentious political tactic; in fact, the Supreme Court has heard several cases in the past four decades attempting to clarify what constitutes an unlawful agreement.
The Latin phrase “quid pro quo” translates to “something for something.” The term originally came from the 1500s, when apothecaries would prescribe a replacement for a certain treatment because they did not have it in store. Nowadays, it means doing something with the intention of receiving something in return.
Bribery, blackmail, or a conditional arrangement (such as asking for something unrelated to work in exchange for not terminating an employee) are all examples of unlawful quid pro quos. However, public opinion may remain unfavorable even if a quid pro quo is ultimately determined to be lawful.
Gift-giving and trading are only two examples of the numerous forms of quid pro quo. In a sexual harassment lawsuit, for instance, the connection between financial gain or job promotion and sexual favors might constitute an unlawful quid pro quo.
The expressions “this for that,” “tit for tat,” and “I scratch your back, you scratch mine” all indicate the same thing as quid pro quo.
What we call a “quid pro quo” occurs when one party does an action in return for another’s performance of an equal or greater value. A classic example of this type of agreement is a favor that one party grants to another with the hope that they would repay the favor at some point in the future. Rather than money, this arrangement frequently involves one service for another. It has extensive use in the political and corporate spheres.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment
Most recent blogs:
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment