Anticipatory Repudiation
Anticipatory repudiation of contract or anticipatory breach occurs when a party to a contract acts, conducts, or makes a statement that reasonably makes the other party believe that the other side will breach the contract. A simple example is when a car seller entered into a written contract to sell you a specific car for $5,000 but sold that same car to another person.
By Brad Nakase
Email | Call (800) 484-4610
The meaning of anticipatory repudiation in contract law is when a party to a contract shows that they will not perform or inability to perform their contractual obligation. When one party rejects a bilateral contract, they set into motion an anticipatory breach. However, the violated party can reject the repudiation and attempt to continue with the contract. In addition, the damaged party can take legal action against the breaching party and attempt to collect damages. For example, if the contract was for selling certain items, the violated party can attempt to collect those items. Therefore, when repudiation occurs, one party has chosen to violate a contract. There are two different kinds of breaches: anticipatory breach and actual breaches.
In short, an anticipatory breach is a violation of a contract before the terms are fulfilled or, in other words, before one or both parties finish the performance. In this type of breach, the promisor decides not to act by the contract. The promisor signifies this verbally or through their conduct.
In this article, our breach of contract attorney in Los Angeles discusses anticipatory repudiation as follows:
When Does Anticipatory Repudiation Occur?
Anticipatory Repudiation occurs when one contract party presumes that the other side will violate the contract. Sometimes, the individual senses that the person is going to default, and other times the person has some knowledge leading them to believe that a breach is incoming.
An Anticipatory Breach Example
A seller is selling their property to a buyer in a real estate sale, and both parties agree on a contract. However, three days before the closing date, the seller decides not to sell or to sell to another buyer for a higher price. This situation leaves the buyer in a difficult position, as they have committed time and possibly money to their search for the new property.
If the buyer thinks the seller will violate the agreement, they can claim a breach of contract. Legally, anticipatory breaches present a complex case because of the question of evidence. Actions and words can illustrate that the seller in the aforementioned example will violate the contract, but proving this impending refusal is valid can be difficult.
Anticipatory repudiation occurs during many contract exchanges in business, employment, real estate, commercial, etc. Unfortunately, these types of breaches occur fairly often, so the question becomes: what can people do about it?
How Can Individuals Resolve Anticipatory Repudiation?
When one party indicates that they cannot or refuse to satisfy their obligations according to the contract they signed, the other party is often left hanging and unsure of how to proceed.
However, both actions and speech can illustrate that the refusing party intends to opt out of the deal. Therefore, when one individual realizes that the other person will default on the shared contract, they should first formally breach of contract.
After making this claim, the individual can seek damages. At this point, we strongly recommend that the violated party contact a licensed attorney for assistance since there are multiple choices to navigate. The party can, for example, suspend the contract, demand that the other party fulfill the contract, or take other legal action depending on the conditions and extent of the contract. Additionally, the value of the contract often dictates the legal response. For example, if one person were about to spend $1 million on the house, they would seek more serious action than someone who signed a contract to purchase a $400 guitar.
What is a Simple Example of Anticipatory Repudiation?
Many of us struggle to understand the nuances of anticipatory breaches. Here is a simple example to illustrate the circumstances that constitute this type of legal contract violation.
Jim and Tim agree on a contract on February 1st. According to the contract, Jim will sell his drum set to Tim on February 10th for $500.
However, Jim makes a decision that violates his contract with Tim. Jim decides to sell his drum set to another friend, Bartholomew, for $600 on February 5th.
Jim’s conduct signals an anticipatory breach of contract. An attorney’s first question for Tim may be: was there any indication, verbally or through his actions, that Jim was going to breach this contract?
If Tim did get a verbal indication from Jim, or Jim’s actions revealed that this breach was to occur, then it may be easier to take legal action.
What Specific Situations Constitute an Anticipatory Breach of Contract?
Numerous situations constitute a violation of the contract. Accordingly, the violation should arrive forthrightly and be directed at the other party involved in the contract.
When the party refuses to comply with the contract, their refusal must be absolute, unrestricted, and made to the other party. This refusal can occur through actions, direct speech, or other communications.
What Type of Situations Do These Violations Include?
- Actions that make fulfilling the contract impossible
- The transfer of land or property from one party to a new third party, including a merger, a sale, or any other condition that alters the manner through which the parties must satisfy the contract
- The rejection of the contract, in written or vocal form
- The implied rejection of the contract
The responsibility to ask for contract assurance depends on the compliant party. The Uniform Commercial Code also allows parties to suspend their portion of the contract if they are not satisfied with the violating party’s actions.
Notably, when someone expresses doubt, that signal is not always sufficient to create anticipatory repudiation. When one party expresses doubt, their hesitation or uncertainty may still initiate a failure to uphold the contract or a failure to perform the terms of the contract.
The party that maintains their compliance can choose to terminate their end of the contract. They may also ask the other party to confirm that they will fulfill the contract. Lastly, many parties in this situation contact a professional attorney and immediately find out their options to recoup their losses.
Can Parties Rescind an Anticipatory Breach of Contract?
In some cases, individuals or parties can suggest that they violate the contract but then return to their word. Often, the repudiating party may have suggested abandoning the contract, but they have not yet made the necessary changes.
An individual may also rescind their anticipatory violation if the other party has not yet accepted the terms, or made an opposing claim. These claims may include the following:
- A lack of performance by the other party
- A violation by the other party
Additionally, some parties decide to change their position before satisfying the contract’s terms. In this context, performance means:
- Payment for items or goods
- Delivery of services or goods
Why Is It Important For A Non-Breaching Party To Mitigate Damages?
It is vital for the non-breaching party involved in the contract to work quickly to lessen and control damages. This is because mitigation helps parties avoid the expenses or losses that contract breaches often create.
The innocent party should contact a professional attorney when the other party violates a shared contract. The party that created the violation may not be held responsible or penalized as fully if the innocent party takes too long to take action.
When one party violates a contract, the main question always becomes: how much can the non-breaching party obtain damages if the case proceeds to a court of law?
Mitigating damages, or taking suitable action to limit the harm a party suffers, helps innocent parties collect the correct damages. It also shows the court that the innocent party did not try to take advantage of anyone and acted in good faith instead.
When Should You Contact a California Breach of Contract Attorney?
Navigating situations involving anticipatory repudiation is a challenge for all involved. However, for the innocent party, the challenges are the most difficult.
When one party backs out of a contract or reneges, the other party wonders what to do first. If they act quickly to mitigate damages, they improve their chances of a proper settlement. However, some parties wait to see if the other party will come to their senses and fulfill the contract as promised. Many individuals in this situation feel powerless and become paralyzed. As a result, some innocent parties abandon the contract themselves, some wait for the other party to act, and others contact an attorney immediately.
We recommend that when an anticipatory breach occurs, the non-breaching party contact an experienced attorney at once. At Nakase Wade, our California business lawyers and corporate attorneys have dealt with many cases of anticipatory repudiation in the state. We understand how important signed contracts are to our clients, and we understand their faith in contracts. Our goal is to honor these contracts, protect our clients, and, when appropriate, collect damages on our client’s behalf.
Violating any contract is a serious and irresponsible act, and the repercussions should also be serious. Let the skilled, experienced team at Nakase Wade help you with your anticipatory breach, so you do not sacrifice your goods, property, or reputation. Let us help you mitigate your losses and move on, so you can get on with business.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment
Most recent blogs: