A unilateral contract binds only the offeror, requiring payment only when the offeree completes a specified task. Common examples include reward offers, insurance policies, and open requests, emphasizing performance-based obligations.
By Douglas Wade, Attorney
Email | Call (800) 484-4610
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
In a unilateral contract, one party promises to pay the other only when the other party completes a task. There is no legal responsibility for any party other than the offeror in this arrangement. In contrast to a bilateral contract, which binds both parties equally, a unilateral contract imposes its terms on just one party.
The act of making an offer to another party results in a unilateral contract. In this form of agreement, the offeror requests that the offeree carry out a certain action. The offeror will only pay if the task is completed, and the offeree is under no obligation to do so.
According to contract law, a unilateral contract is enforceable; however, the offeree usually doesn’t go to court to enforce the contract unless they demand payment for the request.
For a contract to be considered breached, the offeree must be able to demonstrate that they are eligible for payment of certain acts according to the provisions of the unilateral contract and that the terms of the contract were clear.
Different Forms of Unilateral Contracts
Typically, the offeree is not bound in a unilateral contract. Unilateral contracts are prevalent and typically take the form of open requests or insurance policies.
When one party is prepared to pay for another’s actions in any manner, unilateral contracts work well.
A good example of a unilateral contract would be these open requests. In a free market economy, offerers can make general or optional requests through unilateral contracts. Payment for the requests is contingent upon the fulfillment of certain requirements. Requests for rewards are common. For instance, in a criminal case, the government might provide a reward to an individual who divulges crucial details regarding the “wanted” offender or the case at large.
One or more people who fulfill the requirements can receive the reward. The same holds true for labor requests in unilateral contracts.
A business or person may post an ad asking for the promise of payment in exchange for the completion of a particular task. Here we have Person A advertising a $500 payment for a tutor who can help them prepare for an upcoming test. Individual B prepares Individual A for the test. As per the request made in the advertisement, Person A is now required to pay $500 to Person B.
Everyday life is filled with open requests. As an example, you might print out flyers and hand them out to your neighbors if your pet goes missing. The next step is to put a “missing reward” ad in the paper or on social media, offering a $150 reward to the person who can locate and bring your pet back to you.
Given that you’re pledging to compensate whoever finds your pet, this arrangement is clearly an example of a unilateral contract. There was no one-sided agreement about who had to meet your criteria, and the reward money was entirely up to you.
One other type of contract that can be considered unilateral is an insurance contract. The insurance company guarantees payment of a specific amount in the event that an unforeseen occurrence takes place when you seek their services. But if it doesn’t materialize, the business is under no obligation to compensate you.
There are four conditions that must be satisfied for a unilateral contract to be enforceable:
1. Agreement
All parties involved must freely and voluntarily accept an offer made by one another, free from any form of coercion or force.
2. Consideration
Payment of any kind is acceptable as consideration for a promise or agreement. Any asset or right that the parties agree will be sufficient to cover the agreed-upon price can be regarded as consideration.
3. Intention
For an agreement to be legally binding, both parties must fully comprehend its terms and conditions and act with their best intentions.
4. Certainty
In order to fulfill the contract’s requirements, both parties must have a thorough understanding of them. Fulfillment of a unilateral contract is contingent upon the completion of a specific action or task.
There are two types of contracts: unilateral and bilateral. The only party obligated in a unilateral contract is the one making the offer. No further action or completion of the task is required of the offeree.
Both the offeror and the offeree are equally liable in a bilateral contract because they both agree to a duty. The level of reciprocal obligation between the two parties is the main differentiator between unilateral and bilateral contracts.
In a unilateral contract, neither party requires the other to carry out the work or even accept the offer. But in a bilateral contract, the promises and agreements are binding.
Some remedies for a mistake that occurs during a unilateral contract include contract reform, which involves changing the contract or starting a new one, or full cancellation of the contract.
At any point prior to the commencement of the specified obligation, either party to a unilateral contract may revoke it. If the offeree has already begun to perform, the promisor’s or offerer’s ability to revoke the contract is conditional on the following:
Unilateral contracts of the performance type: one party offers another party a fixed sum, say $200, in exchange for the other party’s assistance in completing a certain task. There is no way to back out of the agreement once the offeree begins working on the job.
Contracts of the reward type are one-sided agreements typically created to provide rewards. Assume you have proposed a price of $150 for your missing pet. It doesn’t matter if the offeree has begun working on the contract; you can still revoke it. On the other hand, it ought to be done before the task being completed.
In the past, it was possible to cancel a performance contract even after the offeree began to take action under it, according to the laws governing business. Now, though, that rule doesn’t apply. Without making the payment, the offeror will be in breach of their obligation once the offeree starts acting and finishes the task.
Two or more parties can enter into a legally binding agreement on predetermined terms and conditions through a bilateral contract. Usually, a written contract will stipulate the aforementioned duties and responsibilities of each party. In the business world, it is the most fundamental form of contract.
Each party to a bilateral contract promises to fulfill their end of the bargain. To establish a legally binding agreement between two parties, one party must make an offer, and the other party must accept that offer. Each party must have the legal ability to enter into and perform the terms of the contract, and the value exchange must be clear.
Our most fundamental commercial dealings typically involve bilateral contracts rather than unilateral ones. If you want a cup of coffee at your favorite cafe, for instance, you have to put an order and pay for it. Just like when you go to the doctor, buy a dress, or borrow a book from the library, you’re actually taking part in a contract between two parties.
Any time you make a promise to pay someone a certain amount for their product or service, you’re engaging in a specific action.
While this is a necessary business practice for bilateral contracts, keep in mind that you are not formally entering into a contract in these instances.
Consider a real estate contract as an example. You and the real estate firm enter into a legally binding agreement to buy a house in such an arrangement. The time has come for both parties to meet their respective commitments. You must pay a certain amount of money to the company in exchange for them giving you the house of your dreams.
It is possible to breach a bilateral contract in the same way as a unilateral contract. The usual grounds for revoking a bilateral contract are the parties’ respective failures to fulfill their promises or interference with one another’s performance of their duties.
Revocation of bilateral contracts occurs frequently in situations where one party refuses to fulfill their promise or where an employee violates the agreement’s terms and conditions.
The number of parties participating is the most obvious distinction between unilateral and bilateral contracts.
In a unilateral contract, only one party makes a promise or signs a contract for a certain group of people. Conversely, in order to negotiate, agree, and fulfill a promise in a bilateral contract, there must be a minimum of two parties. The completion of an action constitutes acceptance of a unilateral contract, whereas the signing of both parties’ signatures constitutes acceptance of a bilateral contract.
Unilateral contracts differ from bilateral contracts in numerous ways. Is there any similarity between them, though? The answer is yes. These are just a few examples:
When parties enter into either kind of agreement, it legally binds them. Because of this, the law mandates that the entities fulfill their contractual duties or face legal repercussions.
There are two crucial components to the two contracts. These constitute an assurance and an appraisal.
Unilateral contracts predominate in our day-to-day interactions, despite the prevalence of bilateral agreements in business. From a business perspective, it is in everyone’s best interest for an offeror and an offeree to enter into a bilateral contract. Since both parties agree on the terms, it also fosters confidence and trust between them.
In today’s technologically advanced world, no company can function effectively without the proper equipment. The use of contract lifecycle management (CLM) software can alleviate some of the stress associated with managing contracts in a fast-paced business environment. A contract lifecycle management system (CLM) can aid in compliance management, centralize contract storage, automate notifications and reminders, track contract versions, monitor performance, and integrate with other systems.
In particular, CLM tools can centralize the storage of unilateral contracts, organize them according to different criteria, set reminders for important dates, track changes to contracts, monitor performance milestone progress, integrate with other systems to share data and automate processes, and guarantee compliance with applicable regulations and industry standards.
Organizations can improve efficiency, mitigate risk, and manage unilateral contracts more effectively with the help of a CLM platform that leverages these capabilities. This is very helpful for keeping track of common types of unilateral contracts like warranties, purchase orders, and licenses.
A unilateral contract creates an obligation on the part of the offeror alone. The person making the offer will only pay if the offeree completes the task or activity. In contrast to a bilateral contract, which binds both parties equally, a unilateral contract imposes its terms on just one party.
Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment
Most recent blogs:
See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment
