What Is Joint Employer Rule in California?

Under the joint employer (aka: joint employment) rule, a worker can sue a company other than the direct employer for wage and hour violations.

By Brad Nakase, Attorney

Email  |  Call (800) 484-4610

A joint employer means when one company, called the primary employer, is so connected to another company, known as the secondary employer, that employees of the secondary company may also be considered employees of the primary employer. One example of joint employers may be found in the relationship between contractors and temporary staffing agencies. Another joint employer relationship may be found between contractors and subcontractors.

The test for joint employment is to determine if the primary employer “employ” the worker: (1) to exercise control over wages, hours, or working conditions, directly or indirectly, or through an agent or any other person; (2) to “suffer or permit to work”; or (3) to engage. Martinez v. Combs, 49 Cal.4th 35 (2010). The key factors in determining joint employer are:

  • If the primary hires workers or has a say in the selection process
  • If the primary compensates the workers or assigns their compensation
  • If the primary controls the activities of the workers on a day-to-day basis or supervises performance
  • If the primary has the authority to discipline workers, terminate employment, or enforce workplace rules

In this article, our attorney for employers discusses joint employer liability as follows:

What are the risks of co-employment?

A joint employment relationship may become problematic when the primary employer is held responsible, or liable, for the secondary employer’s labor violations.

Let’s imagine a staffing agency that supplies companies with workers during hectic times of the year, such as during seasonal highs or the holidays. While the staffing agency does not onboard these workers directly, it remains a question whether the agency can be held liable in the event one of the workers hurst themselves on the job or submits a complaint about not getting paid. In this scenario, should the staffing agency be worried?

There are at least two joint employer concepts in California that might place responsibility on the companies that contract with staffing agencies or labor contractors. Section 2810.3 of the Labor Code states that some employers might be considered jointly legally responsible for labor violations that contractors like staffing agencies may commit. A company with twenty-five or more workers that partners with such an agency will have shared legal responsibility and civil liability for all workers that the staffing agency provides. This liability is for the following:

  • Inability to ensure employees’ compensation coverage
  • The payment of wages

However, under this law, joint liability is not relevant for the following:

  • A bona fide apprenticeship program, hiring hall, or labor organization run by a union agreement
  • A bona fide community-based nonprofit organization that provides services to workers
  • A motion picture payroll services company
  • Workers who are independent contractors
  • In certain situations, a third party that participates in an employee leasing agreement
  • A homeowner who sponsors services at their home or the owner of a business based at home
  • Certain household movers, motor carriers, motor clubs, and cable operators

Section 2810.3 of the Labor Code states that an aggrieved worker must provide the company that works with the hiring agency no less than thirty days’ warning before submitting a civil suit against the company for violating this law.

When a company exhibits indirect or direct control over an employee provided by a staffing agency or intermediary entity, joint liability for wage and hour claims can arise.

In the case Medina v. Equilon Enterprises (Sept. 2021), the court decided that there is joint employment when the company has enough power over the intermediary to dictate, if indirectly, the hours, working conditions, and wages of the worker. In this scenario, Shell Oil established a contract with a Multi-Site Operator (MSO) so that the latter would operate its gas station. Mr. Medina worked for the MSO. The multi-site operator was in charge of firing, hiring, disciplining, training, and maintaining payroll. Shell offered in-depth instructions on how to follow employment laws. The MSO was not permitted to alter the duties of employees, including Mr. Medina. Accordingly, the court decided that the MSO and Shell were joint employers who were therefore responsible for the unpaid wages of Mr. Medina. This is because Shell had enough power over the MSO to indirectly control Mr. Medina’s hours, working conditions, and wages.

A California company that makes use of an intermediary company to provide employees should be conscious of the risks associated with joint employment. Specifically, the company should go over issues related to being in compliance with the state’s workers compensation laws, labor laws, as well as indemnity in the parties’ written agreement related to services.

The biggest risks associated that come with joint employment relationships involve the primary employer taking on the secondary employer’s employment liabilities. The following are some examples:

  1. Labor violations. According to the Fair Labor Standards Act, a primary employer can be held responsible for the secondary employer’s failure to pay employees wages or overtime.

  2. Employment harassment and discrimination. According to a number of state and federal anti-discrimination laws, a primary company may be found responsible if the secondary employer harasses or unlawfully fires one of its workers based on a protected class (age, sex, race, disability, religion, etc.)

  3. Medical leave obligations. A primary employer may not have enough employees to support FMLA obligations, but joint employers may both have FMLA obligations if their joint workforce is big enough. Also, if a secondary does not comply with existing FMLA obligations, a primary may be held liable.

  4. Collective bargaining and union obligations. According to the National Labor Relations Act, a joint employer can lead to a primary being found liable for the secondary’s unfair labor practices. It may also result in the primary being forced to comply with any collective bargaining agreement of the secondary. If a secondary’s workers are involved in an employment dispute, a joint employer can give up the primary’s right to avoid boycotting and pickets.

What does joint employer liability mean?

If an FLSA situation arises, then the two or more employers in a joint employer relationship share liability. This means that both the franchisor and the franchisee could be held responsible for any Department of Labor penalties assigned for the FLSA breaches.

Prior to this change in the rules, a court would assess to what degree employers were associated and then hold both parties responsible. The new rule provides a four-factor test that looks at the following:

  • Which employer is in charge of hiring and firing
  • Who decides on the employees’ pay rate and method of payment
  • Which employer controls the employees’ work schedule and duties
  • Who keeps employee records

It should be noted that none of the above factors is sufficient on its own for a joint-employment status. There should be some degree of the other elements involved.

In the past, joint employer liability meant that a franchisee and a franchisor might be held jointly responsible for any employee disputes brought under the FLSA. The rationale was that the franchisor determined how the franchisee interacted with employees and should be considered also liable.

Because a franchisor could be held liable for the supposed breaches of their franchisee, many franchisors chose to withhold assistance to their franchisees when it came to hiring, terminating, and retaining employees. As a result, the franchisees suffered in that they received less support from the franchisors.

How do I avoid joint employer liability?

To avoid joint employer liability, a company should have protections in the staffing agreement or subcontract. This agreement should state that the secondary:

  • Is solely responsible for all training, including safety training
  • Will comply with labor laws and will indemnify the primary for breaches
  • Is solely responsible for recruiting, pre-employment testing and screening, maintaining personnel files, paying wages and benefits, providing personnel policies, withholding taxes, and maintaining insurance coverage
  • Is solely responsible for setting schedules, directing daily activities, hiring, conducting performance reviews, and disciplining and terminating

This agreement should have an agreed-upon scope or duration. There should be procedures in place that indicate how managers of the primary interact with the secondary’s employees. If a safety violation happens, for instance, it may be permissible for the primary’s supervisor to remove the at-fault worker from the workplace but not to discipline them. Also, while it may be okay to put in quality control checks, it may not be acceptable to control the workers’ day-to-day activities. Managers and supervisors should be trained on how to maintain this balance. Possibly the best way to protect against joint employer liability is to make sure that staffing agencies or subcontractors understand and follow their legal obligations to their workers.

Have a quick question? We answered nearly 2000 FAQs.

See all blogs: Business | Corporate | Employment

Most recent blogs:

CA Bereavement Leave 2025 - AB 1949 Rules, Paid vs Unpaid Time, and Employer Compliance

CA Bereavement Leave 2025: AB 1949 Rules, Paid vs Unpaid Time, and Employer Compliance

California AB 1949 requires employers to provide up to five days of bereavement leave for eligible employees in 2025. It covers eligibility, paid versus unpaid time, documentation rules, employer obligations, and compliance risks for California businesses.
Pre-Employment Drug Test California - Laws, Requirements, and Employer Guidelines

Pre-Employment Drug Test California: Laws, Requirements, and Employer Guidelines

California employers can require pre-employment drug testing under strict regulations, with exceptions for safety-sensitive roles and federal compliance. Workers have rights regarding confidentiality, fairness, and contesting results, and businesses must update policies for California’s new marijuana laws.
Does California Drug Test for Weed - AB 2188 Employment Rules

Does California Drug Test for Weed? AB 2188 Employment Rules

California AB 2188 limits employer drug testing for non-psychoactive marijuana use and permits impairment and active THC testing. Beginning January 2024, most employees gain workplace protections, though safety-sensitive and federally regulated positions remain exempt.
Make Up Time in California - Rules, Overtime Exceptions, and Employee Rights

Make Up Time in California: Rules, Overtime Exceptions, and Employee Rights

Make-up time in California lets non-exempt employees offset missed hours without losing pay under defined legal rules. This guide covers overtime exceptions, employee rights, and employer duties for make-up time requests under state labor laws.
California Tipped Minimum Wage - 2025 Rates, Laws, and Employee Rights

California Tipped Minimum Wage: 2025 Rates, Laws, and Employee Rights

California servers must receive the full state minimum wage of $16.50 per hour in 2025, plus any earned tips. Employers cannot take tips, pay below the minimum wage, or violate California Labor Code protections for tipped workers.
Regular Rate of Pay in California - Overtime, Meal and Rest Break Premiums, and Employer Compliance

Regular Rate of Pay in California: Overtime, Meal and Rest Break Premiums, and Employer Compliance

California employers must calculate overtime, meal, and rest break premiums using the regular rate of pay, including bonuses and incentives. Miscalculating regular rates can result in lawsuits, penalties, and compliance risks, making accurate payroll practices vital for businesses across the state.
Overtime Tax Rate California - Overtime Pay and Taxes in 2025

Overtime Tax Rate California: Overtime Pay and Taxes in 2025

Overtime pay in California is taxed like regular income, with brackets based on total annual earnings. For 2025–2028, a temporary deduction lets workers write off up to $12,500 ($25,000 joint) of qualifying overtime.
California Labor Code 5814 - Penalties for Delayed or Unreasonable Workers’ Compensation Payments

California Labor Code 5814: Penalties for Delayed or Unreasonable Workers’ Compensation Payments

California Labor Code 5814 outlines penalties for delayed workers’ compensation, protecting injured employees from financial hardship caused by late payments. Workers may claim up to 25 percent penalties for unreasonable delays, ensuring timely disability benefits, medical coverage, and settlement reimbursements.
California Labor Code 202 -Final Paycheck Rules When Employees Quit

California Labor Code 202: Final Paycheck Rules When Employees Quit

California Labor Code 202 requires employers to pay final wages on time when employees resign, with timing based on notice given. Workers may also claim unused vacation pay, request retirement fund deposits, or seek penalties for delayed payments.
California Labor Code 1174 - Employer Timekeeping and Recordkeeping Requirements

California Labor Code 1174: Employer Timekeeping and Recordkeeping Requirements

California Labor Code 1174 outlines employer timekeeping and recordkeeping duties, allowing electronic or paper systems when records are indelible. Keep records in California, preserve them at least three years, and provide accessible copies to workers and authorities.
Labor Code 1194 (California) - Overtime and Minimum Wage Rights, and Remedies

Labor Code 1194 California: Overtime and Minimum Wage Rights, and Remedies

California Labor Code 1194 protects workers seeking unpaid minimum wage and overtime, providing legal remedies, interest, and reasonable attorney’s fees. Employees can file lawsuits or arbitration claims to recover wages, enforce rights, and safeguard against unlawful employer practices in California.
California Labor Code Section 2810.3 - Employer Liability for Labor Contractor Violations

California Labor Code Section 2810.3: Employer Liability for Labor Contractor Violations

California Labor Code Section 2810.3 makes client employers liable for labor contractor wage violations and missing workers’ compensation coverage. Reduce risk through careful vetting, clear contracts, payroll monitoring, and tight compliance with statutory duties and narrow exemptions.
California Labor Code 201 - Final Paycheck Rules, Employee Rights, and Employer Obligations

California Labor Code 201: Final Paycheck Rules, Employee Rights, and Employer Obligations

California Labor Code 201 requires immediate final paychecks at discharge, covering unpaid wages, unused vacation, and earned bonuses. Employees may seek penalties and file claims if payment is delayed or withheld.
Labor Code 510 - California Overtime Pay, Exceptions, and Calculations

Labor Code 510: California Overtime Pay, Exceptions, and Calculations

California Labor Code 510 outlines overtime pay rules, exemptions, and calculation methods, protecting employees from unfair wage practices and misclassification. This guide explains daily and weekly overtime, special worker protections, and the legal steps available if overtime pay is denied.
Meal Premium California - Laws, Penalties, and Employer Compliance

Meal Premium California: Laws, Penalties, and Employer Compliance

California meal premium rules require employers to provide compliant breaks or face fines, lawsuits, and costly penalties. Use clear policies, precise tracking, and regular reviews to maintain compliance and avoid financial or reputational harm.
Employee Record Retention by State - Guide for Employers

Employee Record Retention by State: Guide for Employers

State-by-state employee record retention guide covering payroll, unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation, child labor, discrimination, and access. Get clear timelines and required details for Alabama to Wyoming so employers meet audits, claims, and compliance duties.
How Much Notice Does an Employer Have to Give for a Schedule Change in California

How Much Notice Does an Employer Have to Give for a Schedule Change in California?

California employers must follow state and local rules on schedule changes, including notice periods, overtime, and reporting time pay. This guide explains meal breaks, overtime, predictable scheduling, local city ordinances, and penalties for violating California labor laws.
Employment Mediation - Process, Benefits, Preparation, and What to Expect

Employment Mediation: Process, Benefits, Preparation, and What to Expect

Employment mediation offers a faster, cost-effective alternative to litigation for resolving workplace disputes. Get the process, benefits, preparation steps, what to expect, possible outcomes, and mediator roles.
What Is Fair Chance Hiring - Meaning, Benefits, and How It Works for Employers

What Is Fair Chance Hiring? Meaning, Benefits, and How It Works for Employers

Fair chance hiring gives candidates with criminal records fair consideration, helping employers access loyal, diverse, and skilled talent. It strengthens compliance, lowers turnover, and helps build high performance teams without compromising workplace safety.
California Labor Code Section 204 - Employee Rights When Employers Pay Late

California Labor Code Section 204: Employee Rights When Employers Pay Late

Late wage payments in California can trigger penalties under Labor Code Section 204, protecting employees from repeated payroll delays. Workers have legal options including waiting time penalties, wage claims, and attorney assistance to secure timely pay.
California Equal Pay Act - Differences from Federal Law, Employer Duties, and Employee Protections

California Equal Pay Act: Differences from Federal Law, Employer Duties, and Employee Protections

California’s Equal Pay Act expands protections beyond federal law, covering pay disparities by sex, race, and ethnicity. Employers must justify wage differences with valid factors; employees gain retaliation safeguards, filing options, and potential damages.
I-9 Compliance - Employer Rules, Penalties, and Best Practices

I-9 Compliance: Employer Rules, Penalties, and Best Practices

I-9 compliance helps employers verify work authorization, meet federal rules, and avoid costly fines, penalties, and legal issues. Use proper documentation, audits, E-Verify, and training to maintain compliance and reduce employment verification risks.
California Labor Code - Divisions, Laws, and Employee Rights Overview

California Labor Code: Divisions, Laws, and Employee Rights Overview

California Labor Code overview covering divisions, employee rights, workplace safety, workers’ compensation, and enforcement across key industries. Trace major milestones, landmark cases, and updates that shape employer obligations and protections for California workers today.
Are Non Solicitation Agreements Enforceable in California - Exceptions and Legal Insights

Are Non-Solicitation Agreements Enforceable in California? Exceptions and Legal Insights

Non-solicitation agreements in California are mostly unenforceable, except when tied to trade secrets, business sales, or partnership dissolutions. This article outlines key exceptions, legal challenges, and how courts determine when limited restrictions may stand under state law.
California Labor Code Section 226 - Wage Statement Requirements & Penalties

California Labor Code Section 226: Wage Statement Requirements & Penalties

California Labor Code Section 226 sets strict paystub requirements and exposes employers to lawsuits, PAGA penalties, and fees. Review wage statements for all nine items; third party payroll services do not shield companies from compliance mistakes.
Do You Have to Sign a Write Up at Work - Employee Rights and Employer Policies Explained

Do You Have to Sign a Write-Up at Work? Employee Rights and Employer Policies Explained

Employees often ask if they must sign a workplace write-up, and the answer depends on labor laws and company policies. This guide explains employee rights, employer practices, and options for responding when faced with disciplinary write-ups.
ABC Test California - AB 5 Exceptions, Borello Factors, and Worker Status

ABC Test California: AB 5 Exceptions, Borello Factors, and Worker Status

AB 5 reshaped California worker classification with the ABC test, Borello factors, and multiple exemptions impacting industries and licensed professionals. This guide covers independent contractor rules, key exceptions, and legal consequences for misclassification under California employment law.
How Long to Keep Employee Files - Record Retention Laws, Timelines, and Best Practices

How Long to Keep Employee Files: Record Retention Laws, Timelines, and Best Practices

Keep employee records compliant with federal and state retention laws to protect your business from fines, lawsuits, and compliance issues. Establish clear policies, digitize securely, and retain files for proper timelines to ensure efficiency, privacy, and legal protection.
Separation of Employment - State Notice Requirements, Termination Letters, and Compliance Guide

Separation of Employment: State Notice Requirements, Termination Letters, and Compliance Guide

State separation laws vary, requiring employers to issue termination notices on time to reduce penalties and compliance risk. This guide covers state notice requirements, termination letters, unemployment benefit notifications, and practical steps for multi-state compliance.
Labor Code Section 2810.5 - CA Hiring and Wage Notice Guide

Labor Code Section 2810.5: CA Hiring and Wage Notice Guide

California Labor Code Section 2810.5 outlines hiring and wage notice requirements employers must follow to avoid penalties and lawsuits. Employers must provide detailed written notices, comply with minimum wage laws, and use official forms to remain compliant.

Free Consultation