California Business Lawyer & Corporate Lawyer
  • Home
  • Services
    • ADA Law
      • ADA Compliance
      • ADA Law
      • ADA Lawsuit Defense
    • Business Law
      • Business Dispute
      • Business Formation
      • Business Law
      • Business Startup
      • Joint Venture Law
      • LLC
      • Mergers and Acquisitions
      • Small Business
    • Business Partnership
      • Partnership Dispute
      • Partnership Agreement
    • Civil Litigation
      • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
      • Business Litigation
      • Breach of Contract Litigation
      • Civil Litigation & Trial Attorneys
      • Class Action Defense
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Corporate Litigation
      • Shareholder Derivative Lawsuit
      • RICO Defense
      • Unfair Competition Defense
    • Contract Law
      • Business Contract
      • Breach of Contract Litigation
    • Corporate Law
      • Corporate Restructuring
      • Business Incorporation
      • Professional Corporation
      • Shareholder Dispute
    • Employment Law
      • EDD Audit
      • EEOC Defense
      • Employer Advice
      • Employer Defense
      • Employer Law
      • Employer Class Action Defense
      • Employment Litigation
      • Labor Board Complaint
      • Labor Board Investigation
      • Labor Law
      • PAGA Claim Defense
      • Retaliation Discrimination Defense
      • Sexual Harassment Defense
      • Wage Dispute Defense
      • WARN Act Defense Litigation
    • Hospitality
      • Restaurants Legal Advising
    • Unruh Act Law Defense
      • Website Accessibility Laws
    • Wildfire Attorney
  • Resources
    • About Us
    • Lawyers Practice Guides
    • California Laws
    • Index Blog Posts
    • Abogados en Español
    • FAQ Labor Laws
  • Contact
  • Tel 800-484-4610
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

California Art Preservation Act Law Definition Elements Defense Lawyer

Definition. The Legislature hereby finds and declares that the physical alteration or destruction of fine art, which is an expression of the artist’s personality, is detrimental to the artist’s reputation, and artists therefore have an interest in protecting their works of fine art against any alteration or destruction; and that there is also a public interest in preserving the integrity of cultural and artistic creations. Cal. Civ. Code §987(a).


Free consultation: 800-484-4610

Nakase Wade law firm represents companies, businesses, and employers – exclusively.

We invite your attention to our disclaimer.


1. Element 1: Artist
2. Element 2: Fine Art
3. Element 3: Physical Alteration or Destruction of Fine Art
4. Remedies
5. Statute of Limitations
6. Affirmative Defenses
7. NOTICE TO REMOVE WORK OF FIND ART – SAMPLE TEMPLATE

Element 1: Artist

 “Artist” means the individual or individuals who create a work of fine art. Cal. Civ. Code §987(b)(2).


Element 2: Fine Art

 “Fine art” means an original painting, sculpture, or drawing, or an original work of art in glass, of recognized quality, but shall not include work prepared under contract for commercial use by its purchaser. Cal. Civ. Code §987(b)(2).


The artist shall retain at all times the right to claim authorship, or, for a just and valid reason, to disclaim authorship of his or her work of fine art. Cal. Civ. Code §987(d).


In determining whether a work of fine art is of recognized quality, the trier of fact shall rely on the opinions of artists, art dealers, collectors of fine art, curators of art museums, and other persons involved with the creation or marketing of fine art. Cal. Civ. Code §987(f).


A mural was determined to be a form of painting included under the term “fine art.” Botello v. Shell Oil Company, 229 Cal. App. 3d 1130, 1138, 280 Cal. Rptr. 535, 540 (1991).


Element 3: Physical Alteration or Destruction of Fine Art

 As stated in Civ. Code §987(c):

(1) No person, except an artist who owns and possesses a work of fine art which the artist has created, shall intentionally commit, or authorize the intentional commission of, any physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of a work of fine art.

(2)      In addition to the prohibitions contained in paragraph (1), no person who frames, conserves, or restores a work of fine art shall commit, or authorize the commission of, any physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of a work of fine art by any act constituting gross negligence. For purposes of this section, the term “gross negligence” shall mean the exercise of so slight a degree of care as to justify the belief that there was an indifference to the particular work of fine art.


As stated in Civ. Code §987(h):

(1)      If a work of fine art cannot be removed from a building without substantial physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of the work, the rights and duties created under this section, unless expressly reserved by an instrument in writing signed by the owner of the building, containing a legal description of the property and properly recorded, shall be deemed waived. The instrument, if properly recorded, shall be binding on subsequent owners of the building.

(2)      If the owner of a building wishes to remove a work of fine art which is a part of the building but which can be removed from the building without substantial harm to the fine art, and in the course of or after removal, the owner intends to cause or allow the fine art to suffer physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction, the rights and duties created under this section shall apply unless the owner has diligently attempted without success to notify the artist, or, if the artist is deceased, his or her heir, beneficiary, devisee, or personal representative, in writing of his or her intended action affecting the work of fine art, or unless he or she did provide notice and that person failed within 90 days either to remove the work or to pay for its removal. If the work is removed at the expense of the artist, his or her heir, beneficiary, devisee, or personal representative, title to the fine art shall pass to that person.

(3)      If a work of fine art can be removed from a building scheduled for demolition without substantial physical defacement, mutilation, alteration, or destruction of the work, and the owner of the building has notified the owner of the work of fine art of the scheduled demolition or the owner of the building is the owner of the work of fine art, and the owner of the work of fine art elects not to remove the work of fine art, the rights and duties created under this section shall apply, unless the owner of the building has diligently attempted without success to notify the artist, or, if the artist is deceased, his or her heir, beneficiary, devisee, or personal representative, in writing of the intended action affecting the work of fine art, or unless he or she did provide notice and that person failed within 90 days either to remove the work or to pay for its removal. If the work is removed at the expense of the artist, his or her heir, beneficiary, devisee, or personal representative, title to the fine art shall pass to that person.

(4)      Nothing in this subdivision shall affect the rights of authorship created in subdivision (d) of this section.


Defendants authorized the destruction of plaintiffs’ mural for which they had received favorable publicity in order to make room for a parking lot. Botello v. Shell Oil Company, 229 Cal. App. 3d 1130, 1133, 280 Cal. Rptr. 535, 536 (1991).

 

Some courts have asserted in dicta that the California Art Preservation Act has been preempted by the federal Visual Artists’ Rights Act, 17 U.S.C. §106A. See Cort v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance, 311 F.3d 979, 984 n.1 (9th Cir. 2002); Lubner v. City of Los Angeles, 45 Cal.App.4th 525, 531, 53 Cal.Rptr.2d 24, 28 (1996).


Remedies

 

Injunctive relief (Cal. Civ. Code §989).

Actual damages (Cal. Civ. Code §987(e)(2)).

Punitive damages (Cal. Civ. Code §987(e)(3)).

Attorneys’ and expert witness fees (Cal. Civ. Code §987(e)(4)).

Any other relief the court deems proper (Cal. Civ. Code §987(e)(5)).


Statute of Limitations

 No action may be maintained to enforce liability under this section unless brought within three years of the act complained of or one year after discovery of the act, whichever is longer. Cal. Civ. Code §987(i).


Affirmative Defenses

Statute of Limitations (see above).


NOTICE TO REMOVE WORK OF FIND ART – SAMPLE TEMPLATE


NOTICE
To: [name and address]
I, the undersigned, am the owner of the building located at [address], the City of , County of , State of California, a part of which is the work of fine art created by you and described as follows: .
You are hereby notified, as the artist who created that work of fine art, that I wish to remove that work from the building described above. That work of fine art can be removed from the building without substantial harm to the work of fine art.
Demand is hereby made that you remove this work of fine art or pay for its removal within 90 days from receipt of this notice.
Dated .
[Signature]
898
© Copyright - California Business Lawyer & Corporate Lawyer, Inc.
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top